[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
非常规油气

基于多层次灰色关联分析法的致密气田集输工艺评价

  • 梁裕如 ,
  • 李娜 ,
  • 刘亮 ,
  • 韩建红 ,
  • 何鹏 ,
  • 艾昕宇
展开
  • 1.陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司天然气研究院 陕西西安 710075;
    2.陕西延长石油(集团)有限责任公司油气勘探公司 陕西延安 716000
梁裕如,女,1984年生,高级工程师,硕士;主要从事油气田地面工程技术研究工作。地址:(710075)陕西省西安市高新区唐延路61号。E-mail:190187691@qq.com

修回日期: 2023-03-02

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-01

基金资助

陕西延长石油集团级科研项目(编号:ycsy2019ky-A-22)、陕西延长石油科研项目(编号:ycsy2021ky-B-10)

Evaluating gathering-transportation process in tight gas fields based on multilevel and grey correlation analysis

  • LIANG Yuru ,
  • LI Na ,
  • LIU Liang ,
  • HAN Jianhong ,
  • HE Peng ,
  • AI Xinyu
Expand
  • 1. Research Institute of Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum (Group) Co., Ltd., Xi'an, Shaanxi 710075, China;
    2. Oil & Gas Exploration Company of Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum (Group) Co., Ltd., Yan'an, Shaanxi 716000, China

Revised date: 2023-03-02

  Online published: 2024-03-01

摘要

致密气田地面集输工程具有建设投资高、工期长、影响因素多等特点,对气田集输工艺进行客观评价关系着气田开发建设全局。以致密气藏延气2-延128井区为例,针对高、中、低压等3套集输工艺进行优缺点分析,建立层次分析法评价指标体系,选取安全生产、工艺技术及经济效益共3项一级评价指标,细化形成井下节流器失效、管线积液、管网压损、集气半径、运行压力、征地面积、计量误差、内部收益率、投资、运行成本共10项二级评价指标,通过层次分析法确定各指标权重,运用灰色关联分析法对高、中、低压等3套集输方案进行评价优选。研究结果表明:①各评价指标权重从高到低依次为:内部收益率、投资、井下节流器失效、管网压损、运行成本、集气半径、管线积液、运行压力、征地面积、计量误差;②将层次分析法计算的指标权重引入灰色关联度分析,计算各方案的灰色关联度,最终确定中压集输工艺的关联度最高,是最优方案。研究结果可为今后国内外致密气田集输工艺的客观比选和决策提供评价手段和参考依据。

本文引用格式

梁裕如 , 李娜 , 刘亮 , 韩建红 , 何鹏 , 艾昕宇 . 基于多层次灰色关联分析法的致密气田集输工艺评价[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2024 , 47(1) : 104 -111 . DOI: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2024.01.013

Abstract

Most gathering-transportation projects in tight gas fields feature high investment, long construction period and numerous influencing factors. Their objective evaluation is related to the overall field development and construction. So, YQ2-Y128 well area was taken as an example to analyze both advantages and disadvantages of three gathering-transportation processes under high, medium and low pressure. Based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP), an evaluation system was established to select three first-grade evaluation indexes (production safety, process technology and economic benefits) and ten second-grade ones (throttle failure, liquid accumulation, pipe network pressure loss, gas-gathering radius, operating pressure, land acquisition, metering error, internal rate of return, investment, and operating costs). In addition, the weight was determined for each index by using AHP, and the method of grey correlation analysis (GCA) was adopted to evaluate these three processes. Results show that (i) the determined indexes rank in an order of descending weight, namely internal rate of return, investment, throttle failure, pressure loss, operating cost, gas-gathering radius, liquid accumulation, operating pressure, land acquisition, and metering error; and (ii) the obtained weight from AHP is introduced into GCA to determine the grey correlation for these processes one by one. As a result, it is determined that, as the optimal one, the gathering-transportation process under medium pressure enjoys the highest correlation. The research results can provide an evaluation means and reference for the objective comparison and decision of gathering-transportation processes in tight gas fields at home and abroad.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

[1] 王香增, 乔向阳, 米乃哲, 等. 延安气田低渗透致密砂岩气藏效益开发配套技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(11): 43-51.
WANG Xiangzeng, QIAO Xiangyang, MI Naizhe, et al.Technologies for the benefit development of low-permeability tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Yan'an Gas Field, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(11): 43-51.
[2] 刘银春, 王莉华, 李卫, 等. 苏里格气田南区块天然气集输工艺技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(6): 69-72.
LIU Yinchun, WANG Lihua, LI Wei, et al.Application of natural gas gathering and transmission technology in the southern block of the Sulige Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(6): 69-72.
[3] 苏海平, 张凤喜, 池坤, 等. 苏里格气田上、下古生界气藏合采气井的集输工艺[J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(10): 83-85.
SU Haiping, ZHANG Fengxi, CHI Kun, et al.Gas gathering and transportation process for the commingled production wells at upper and lower Paleozoic gas reservoirs of the Sulige Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(10): 83-85.
[4] 刘子兵, 陈小锋, 薛岗, 等. 长庆气田天然气集输及净化处理工艺技术[J]. 石油工程建设, 2013, 39(5): 54-60.
LIU Zibing, CHEN Xiaofeng, XUE Gang, et al.Technologies of natural gas gathering and purification in Changqing gas field[J]. Petroleum Engineering Construction, 2013, 39(5): 54-60.
[5] 王登海, 杨家茂, 石万里, 等. 致密气藏低成本地面工艺优化简化技术——以苏里格气田为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(3): 126-130.
WANG Denghai, YANG Jiamao, SHI Wanli, et al.A simplified and optimized ground engineering process with low cost in the development of tight gas reservoirs: A case study of the Sulige Gas Field, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(3): 126-130.
[6] 张春威, 张书勤, 韩建红, 等. 延长气田延气2-延128井区地面集输工艺的优化创新[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2016, 35(4): 42-44.
ZHANG Chunwei, ZHANG Shuqin, HAN Jianhong, et al.Optimization and innovation of surface engineering gathering and transportation technology on Yanchang gas field YQ2-Y128 well area[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2016, 35(4): 42-44.
[7] 张春威, 梁裕如, 薛红波, 等. 延气2-延128井区地面集输工艺技术[J]. 石油规划设计, 2016, 27(4): 39-40.
ZHANG Chunwei, LIANG Yuru, XUE Hongbo, et al.Overview of surface engineering gathering and transportation technology at Yanqi 2-Yan 128 well area[J].Petroleum Planning & Engineering, 2016, 27(4): 39-40.
[8] 王晓光. 延长气田集输工艺探索与实践[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2019, 38(9): 26-30.
WANG Xiaoguang.Exploration and practice of the gathering and transportation process in Yanchang gas field[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2019, 38(9): 26-30.
[9] 张成斌, 易冬蕊, 刘婷婷, 等. 延安气田地面集输工艺的探索与创新[J]. 天然气与石油, 2019, 37(4): 15-20.
ZHANG Chengbin, YI Dongrui, LIU Tingting, et al.Exploration and innovation of gathering & transportation technology in Yan'an gas field[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2019, 37(4): 15-20.
[10] ZHU X.S., QIU J., XIE M., et al. A multi-objective biclustering algorithm based on fuzzy mathematics[J]. Neurocomputing, 2017, 253: 177-182.
[11] TU J. W., TANG A. P. A grey correlation model for analyzing ultimate bearing capacity of large diameter and super-long pile[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011, 138-139: 786-792.
[12] ZHAO Y.P., SUN J. G. Roughν-support vector regression[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(6): 9793-9798.
[13] JIANG F., SUI Y.F., CAO C. G. Some issues about outlier detection in rough set theory[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(3): 4680-4687.
[14] 俞锋. 基于AHP、模糊数学和神经网络的天然气增压开采方案优选模型研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2007.
YU Feng.Based on AHP, fuzzy mathematics and ANN gasturbo-charged mining plan optimal model study[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2007.
[15] 刘竟成, 刘倩, 何君莲, 等. 管网增压集输方案优选[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2012, 31(9): 42-43.
LIU Jingcheng, LIU Qian, HE Junlian, et al.Optimum gathering-transportation schemes of pipeline network booster[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2012, 31(9): 42-43.
[16] 宋肖苗, 杨剑锋, 陈良超, 等. 多层次灰色综合评价法在储罐失效概率评估中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(11): 156-161.
SONG Xiaomiao, YANG Jianfeng, CHEN Liangchao, et al.Application of grey multi-hierarchy comprehensive evaluation method in failure probability assessment of storage tanks[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(11): 156-161.
[17] 张强, 程万洲, 杨玉锋, 等. 多层次灰色综合评价法在管道风险评价中的应用[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(2): 126-128.
ZHANG Qiang, CHENG Wanzhou, YANG Yufeng, et al.Application of multihierarchy synthetic grey comprehensive evaluation in pipeline risk assessment[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2016, 35(2): 126-128.
[18] 景怡然. 多层次灰色评价法在油气勘探开发项目风险评价中的应用[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2015, 34(9): 10-11.
JING Yiran.Application of multilevel grey evaluation method to risk assessment of petroleum exploration and development projects[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2015, 34(9): 10-11.
[19] 王燕妮, 汪彤, 吕良海, 等. 多层次灰色评价法在沼气站安全评价中的应用[J]. 安全, 2016, 37(5): 29-33.
WANG Yanni, WANG Tong, LV Lianghai, et al.Application of multi-level grey evaluation method to safety assessment of methane-gas stations[J]. Safety & Security, 2016, 37(5): 29-33.
[20] 左代容. 灰色关联分析法在剩余可采储量品位评价中的应用[J]. 断块油气田, 2010, 17(3): 354-356.
ZUO Dairong.Application of gray correlation analysis method in quality evaluation of remaining recoverable reserves[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2010, 17(3): 354-356.
[21] 王克, 吉卫喜. 基于层次分析—灰色关联法的机械加工工艺方案评价研究[J]. 现代制造工程, 2019(2): 24-30.
WANG Ke, JI Weixi.Evaluation of machining process scheme based on hierarchical analysis and grey correlation analysis[J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2019(2): 24-30.
[22] 杨烨, 陆学同, 刘健, 等. 基于灰色关联分析与层次分析法的LNG工厂冬防保温[J]. 油气储运, 2019, 38(1): 81-86.
YANG Ye, LU Xuetong, LIU Jian, et al.Winter insulation of LNG plant based on grey correlation analysis and analytical hierarchy process[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2019, 38(1): 81-86.
[23] 李严琛. 基于灰色关联和层次分析法的城市燃气管网风险评估[J]. 中外企业家, 2019(18): 128-129.
LI Yanchen.Risk assessment of urban gas pipeline network based on grey correlation and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Chinese & Foreign Entrepreneurs, 2019(18): 128-129.
[24] 刘武, 纪国文, 罗召钱, 等. 天然气矿场集输系统用能分析及评价方法研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2016, 45(3): 109-116.
LIU Wu, JI Guowen, LUO Zhaoqian, et al.Energy analysis and evaluation method study of natural gas gathering and transportation system[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2016, 45(3): 109-116.
[25] 纪国文. 天然气矿场集输系统用能评价技术研究及软件开发[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2015.
JI Guowen.Technologies and software to evaluate energy use for natural gas gathering system[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[26] 唐霏. 天然气集输系统能效综合评价技术研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2018.
TANG Fei.Research on energy efficiency comprehensive evaluation technology of natural gas gathering and transportation system[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2018.
文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]