[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

天然气勘探与开发 >

2024 , Vol. 47 >Issue 3: 77 - 84

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2024.03.009

非常规油气

阵列声波测井在致密砂岩气藏含气性评价中的应用

  • 夏小勇 ,
  • 王跃祥 ,
  • 谢冰 ,
  • 赖强 ,
  • 韩冰 ,
  • 朱绍武 ,
  • 高义兵
展开
  • 1.中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院 四川成都 610041;
    2.中国石油集团测井有限公司西南分公司 重庆 400021
夏小勇,男,1987年生,工程师;主要从事测井资料解释评价工作。地址：（610041）四川省成都市高新区天府大道北段12号。E-mail:565042074@qq.com

修回日期: 2023-11-14

  网络出版日期: 2024-06-27

收起

Array acoustic logging to evaluate gas-bearing property in tight sandstone gas reservoirs

  • XIA Xiaoyong ,
  • WANG Yuexiang ,
  • XIE Bing ,
  • LAI Qiang ,
  • HAN Bing ,
  • ZHU Shaowu ,
  • GAO Yibing
Expand
  • 1. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China;
    2. Southwest Company, China National Logging Corporation, Chongqing 400021, China

Revised date: 2023-11-14

  Online published: 2024-06-27

Fold

摘要

四川盆地中部地区天府气田中侏罗统沙溪庙组致密砂岩气藏是近年来勘探的热点和重点,但有别于常规砂岩气藏,此类气藏岩性复杂、储集条件差,常规的电法测井难以准确反映储层含气性的变化。选取阵列声波测井,进行曲线含气敏感性分析,优选纵波时差差值法、拉梅系数—体积压缩系数曲线重叠法,对储层的含气性进行评价。并进一步开展岩石不同饱和度状态下声速实验,探索通过阵列声波测井定量计算储层含气饱和度的方法。研究结果表明：①针对川中地区致密砂岩储层,基于阵列声波测井的曲线包络面法,相较于电法测井含气性测井解释符合率明显增加,能够较好地对致密砂岩储层含气性进行评价;②综合纵横波速度比和体积模量计算含水饱和度,与密闭取心得到的含水饱和度相关性较好,可为致密砂岩储层划分和参数计算提供依据,对四川盆地其他致密砂岩储层含气性评价具有指导作用。

关键词： 四川盆地; 中侏罗世; 致密砂岩气藏; 阵列声波; 含气性评价; 曲线包络面法; 纵横波速度比

本文引用格式

夏小勇 , 王跃祥 , 谢冰 , 赖强 , 韩冰 , 朱绍武 , 高义兵 . 阵列声波测井在致密砂岩气藏含气性评价中的应用[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2024 , 47(3) : 77 -84 . DOI: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2024.03.009

Abstract

Tight sandstone gas reservoirs of the Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Tianfu gasfield, central Sichuan Basin, have developed into the hot and key exploration domain in recent years. Different from conventional ones, such reservoirs, however, have complex lithology and poor reservoir conditions. Some variations on their gas-bearing property cannot be accurately reflected by using traditional electrical logging. Thus, array acoustic data were used to analyze curve sensitivity to this property. And two methods of longitudinal wave moveout and Lame coefficient-volume compressibility curve overlap were selected for property evaluation. Furthermore, acoustic-wave experiments were conducted in rocks with different saturation to create one way to quantitatively calculate gas saturation using array acoustic data. Results show that (i) for the tight sandstone reservoirs in central Sichuan Basin, one way of curve envelope based on array acoustic data may achieve much higher coincidence of gas-bearing logging interpretation than electrical logging, and can better estimate the gas-bearing property; and (ii) combining the ratio of longitudinal-wave velocity to transverse-wave velocity (Vp/Vs) and the bulk modulus, the calculated water saturation has a good correlation with that from sealed coring, which may not only provide basis for reservoir classification and parameter calculation but guide the evaluation on the gas-bearing property in other tight sandstone reservoirs in Sichuan Basin.

Key words： Sichuan Basin; Middle Jurassic; Tight sandstone gas reservoir; Array acoustic wave; Evaluation on gas-bearing property; Curve envelope; Vp/Vs ratio

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

[1] 邹才能, 杨智, 朱如凯, 等. 中国非常规油气勘探开发与理论技术进展[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(6): 979-1007.
ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, ZHU Rukai, et al.Progress in China’s unconventional oil & gas exploration and development and theoretical technologies[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89(6): 979-1007.
[2] 张丽华, 潘保芝, 庄华, 等. 低孔隙度低渗透率储层压裂后产能测井预测方法研究[J]. 测井技术, 2012, 36(1): 101-105.
ZHANG Lihua, PAN Baozhi, ZHUANG Hua, et al.Productivity log forecasting method for post-frac reservoir with low porosity and low permeability[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2012, 36(1): 101-105.
[3] 潘保芝, 石玉江, 蒋必辞, 等. 致密砂岩气层压裂产能及等级预测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 649-654.
PAN Baozhi, SHI Yujiang, JIANG Bici, et al.Research on gas yield and level prediction for post-frac tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(2): 649-654.
[4] 鞠江慧, 王建功, 高瑞琴, 等. 二连油田低孔隙度低渗透率储层压裂后产能预测[J]. 测井技术, 2005, 29(4): 379-381.
JU Jianghui, WANG Jiangong, GAO Ruiqin, et al.Productivity forecast of the reservoir with low porosity and low permeability in Erlian oilfield[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2005, 29(4): 379-381.
[5] 张金虎, 高永进, 张君峰, 等. 阵列感应测井在薄储层识别与含油气性评价中的应用——以新疆塔里木盆地温宿凸起为例[J]. 地球学报, 2018, 39(6): 698-706.
ZHANG Jinhu, GAO Yongjin, ZHANG Junfeng, et al.The application of array induction logging to thin reservoir identification and oil-bearing evaluation: A case study of Wensu uplift in Tarim Basin of Xinjiang[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2018, 39(6): 698-706.
[6] 毛克宇. 梨树断陷营城组致密砂岩测井流体识别方法及其适应性分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(10): 1056-1066.
MAO Keyu.Logs fluid typing methods and adaptive analysis of tight sandstone reservoir of Yingcheng Formation in Lishu Fault[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2016, 31(10): 1056-1066.
[7] 庄华. 苏里格气田致密砂岩气层压裂产能测井预测方法研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2013.
ZHUANG Hua.Study on the prediction method of fracturing productivity logging for tight sandstone gas reservoirs in Sulige gas field[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2013.
[8] 张冲, 毛志强, 李光军, 等. 安棚深层系低渗透储层产能预测方法及应用[J]. 测井技术, 2008, 32(6): 562-565.
ZHANG Chong, MAO Zhiqiang, LI Guangjun, et al.Method for productivity prediction of Anpeng deep-seated reservoirs with low permeability and its application[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2008, 32(6): 562-565.
[9] 孙建孟, 韩志磊, 秦瑞宝, 等. 致密气储层可压裂性测井评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1): 74-80.
SUN Jianmeng, HAN Zhilei, QIN Ruibao, et al.Log evaluation method of fracturing performance in tight gas reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(1): 74-80.
[10] 王楠, 刘博彪, 张铭. 测井资料识别油气水层类型方法研究——以印度尼西亚A气田L层为例[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2016, 33(14): 36-40.
WANG Nan, LIU Bobiao, ZHANG Ming.Method for the identification of oil and gas reservoir types with logging data—By taking l layer of Gas Field A in Indonesia for example[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 33(14): 36-40.
[11] 胡素华. 普光地区陆相致密砂岩含气性储层测井评价方法研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2015.
HU Suhua.Research on the logging evaluation methods of compact sandstone gas-bearing reservoirs in Puguang area[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2015.
[12] 陈必孝, 徐炳高. 川西致密碎屑岩测井评价技术综合研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2009, 31(6): 108-114.
CHEN Bixaio, XU Binggao.Logging evaluation technique for compact clastic rocks in West Sichuan[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2009, 31(6): 108-114.
[13] 刘晓敏. 东濮凹陷致密砂岩复杂油气层测井识别方法[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2014, 11(20): 26-29.
LIU Xiaomin.Logging identification method for complex oil and gas reservoirs in tight sandstone in Dongpu Depression[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 11(20): 26-29.
[14] 章雄, 潘和平, 骆淼, 等. 致密砂岩气层测井解释方法综述[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2005, 2(6): 431-436.
ZHANG Xiong, PAN Heping, LUO Miao, et al.Summary of logging interpretation for gas-bearing tight sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2005, 2(6): 431-436.
[15] 王振杰, 李潮流, 张振波. 利用阵列声波测井定量评价低渗透砂岩储层含气性[J]. 国外测井技术, 2010, 30(2): 45-47.
WANG Zhenjie, LI Chaoliu, ZHANG Zhenbo.Quantitative evaluation of gas bearing sandstone reservoir of low permeability with array acoustic logging[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 2010, 30(2): 45-47.
[16] 夏小勇, 姜永攀. 基于核磁测井孔喉分布的致密砂岩储层评价方法——以四川盆地Q区块沙溪庙组二段为例[J]. 海洋石油, 2019, 39(4): 47-54.
XIA Xiaoyong, JIANG Yongpan.Evaluation method of dense sandstone reservoir based on NMR logging pore and throat distribution: Taking the second member of Shaximiao Formation in Q area of Sichuan Basin as an example[J]. Offshore Oil, 2019, 39(4): 47-54.
[17] 杨克兵, 王连君, 刘懿, 等. 阵列声波测井评价致密砂岩气层含气性[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26(4): 486-490.
YANG Kebing, WANG Lianjun, LIU Yi, et al.Gas-bearing properties evaluation of tight sandstone gas reservoir by array acoustic logging[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2019, 26(4): 486-490.
[18] 胡红, 罗宁, 李联新. 阵列声波资料在测井解释中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2008, 20(2): 97-101.
HU Hong, LUO Ning, LI Lianxin.Application of array acoustic wave data in well logging interpretation[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2008, 20(2): 97-101.
[19] 张丽华, 潘保芝, 单刚义, 等. 基于纵横波速度的致密砂岩气层定性识别与定量计算方法研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2017, 4(6): 13-18.
ZHANG Lihua, PAN Baozhi, SHAN Gangyi, et al.Research on gas zone identification and computation in tight sand based on compressional and shear wave velocity[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2017, 4(6): 13-18.
[20] 周彦球, 王贵文, 江程舟, 等. 基于声学特性的致密砂岩储层含气性评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(5): 831-841.
ZHOU Yanqiu, WANG Guiwen, JIANG Chengzhou, et al.Gas-bearing evaluation of tight sandstone reservoir based on acoustic characteristics[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(5): 831-841.
[21] 成志刚, 张蕾, 赵建武, 等. 利用岩石声学特性评价致密砂岩储层含气性[J]. 测井技术, 2013, 37(3): 253-257.
CHEN Zhigang, ZHANG Lei, ZHAO Jianwu, et al.Gas evaluation in tight sand reservoir using acoustic characteristics of rock[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(3): 253-257.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]