[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
资源勘探

差异成岩作用对致密砂岩储集性能的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地吴起—顺宁地区延长组长81亚段为例

  • 岳怀海 , 1 ,
  • 冯明友 , 1 ,
  • 刘小洪 1 ,
  • 肖文联 2 ,
  • 石坚 3 ,
  • 李月娥 1 ,
  • 曹娟 1
展开
  • 1.西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院 四川成都 610500
  • 2.西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院 四川成都 610500
  • 3.中国石油长庆油田公司勘探开发研究院 陕西西安 710018
冯明友,男,1981年生,副教授,博士;主要从事储层地质学及储层综合预测研究工作。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号。E-mail:

岳怀海,男,1990年生,硕士研究生;主要从事沉积相及储层方面的研究工作。地址:(610500)四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号。E-mail:

Copy editor: 金涛

收稿日期: 2024-07-25

  修回日期: 2024-12-08

  网络出版日期: 2025-04-30

基金资助

国家科技重大专项(2017ZX05001001)

Impact of differential diagenesis on the reservoir quality of tight sandstone: An example from Chang 81 submember, Wuqi-Shunning area, Ordos Basin

  • YUE Huaihai , 1 ,
  • FENG Mingyou , 1 ,
  • LIU Xiaohong 1 ,
  • XIAO Wenlian 2 ,
  • SHI Jian 3 ,
  • LI Yue’e 1 ,
  • CAO Juan 1
Expand
  • 1. School of Geosciences and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
  • 2. School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
  • 3. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710018, China

Received date: 2024-07-25

  Revised date: 2024-12-08

  Online published: 2025-04-30

摘要

鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系上统延长组长8油层组是该盆地致密油的勘探目的层之一,相继发现了姬塬、西峰、马岭地区等特大油田,展示出巨大的油气勘探潜力。为了深入研究沉积、成岩作用等控制下的该盆地致密砂岩有效储层分布规律,基于岩心观察、铸体薄片鉴定、扫描电镜及物性分析等实验测试结果,以吴起—顺宁地区延长组长81亚段储集层为研究对象,开展岩石学特征、成岩作用及物性特征等综合研究,明确了成岩相带分布,进而预测了有利储层发育区。研究结果表明:①研究区长81亚段储集岩岩石类型主要为细—中粒长石砂岩及岩屑长石砂岩,储集空间以粒间孔和长石溶孔为主,为特低孔隙度、超低渗透率储层;②主要建设性成岩作用为溶蚀作用,破坏性成岩作用为压实及胶结作用,吴起地区溶蚀作用强度略高于顺宁地区,而压实—胶结作用强度则明显低于顺宁地区;③综合成岩矿物、成岩作用类型及成岩作用强度等因素,在研究区共划分出5类成岩相——碳酸盐+伊利石胶结致密相、压实压溶致密相、自生黏土+碳酸盐胶结相、绿泥石薄膜胶结+溶蚀相、石英加大胶结+溶蚀相,其中后两者为最有利于储层发育的成岩相。结论认为,研究区吴起中部及顺宁中部为最有利的成岩相及储层发育区。

本文引用格式

岳怀海 , 冯明友 , 刘小洪 , 肖文联 , 石坚 , 李月娥 , 曹娟 . 差异成岩作用对致密砂岩储集性能的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地吴起—顺宁地区延长组长81亚段为例[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2025 , 48(2) : 26 -38 . DOI: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2025.02.003

Abstract

Being an important exploration target of tight oil in Ordos Basin, the eighth member of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation (Chang 8 Member) has been discovered from several super-giant oilfields in Jiyuan, Xifeng, Maling areas, suggesting great exploration potential. Therefore, the first submember of Chang 8 Member (Chang 81 submember) in Wuqi-Shunning area was taken as an example to discuss the distribution of effective tight sandstone reservoirs affected by both sedimentation and diagenesis in this basin. For Chang 81 reservoirs, the petrology, diagenesis and physical properties were studied through core observation, cast thin-section observation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and physical property analysis. In addition, the distribution of diagenetic facies belts was figured out, and some favorable zones were predicted for reservoir extension. Results show that (i) characterized by extremely low porosity and permeability, these Chang 81 reservoirs with intergranular pores and feldspar dissolved pores as the dominant reservoir space are dominated by fine- to medium-grained feldspathic sandstone and lithic feldspathic sandstone; (ii) dissolution is deemed as the main constructive diagenesis while both compaction and cementation as destructive one. This dissolution in Wuqi has slightly higher intensity than that in Shunning, whereas the compaction and cementation intensity in Wuqi evidently lower than that in Shunning; and (iii) five diagenetic facies can be divided in the study area in line with diagenetic minerals and diagenesis type and intensity, including carbonate + illite cemented tight facies, compaction-pressolution tight facies, authigenic clay + carbonate cemented facies, chlorite thin-film cementation + dissolution facies, and quartz-enlarged cementation + dissolution facies, among which the latter two are most favorable for reservoir extension. In conclusion, the central Wuqi-Shunning area is in favor of diagenetic facies and reservoir extension.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[1]
邹才能, 张国生, 杨智, 等. 非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术——兼论非常规油气地质学[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4): 385-399.

ZOU Caineng, ZHANG Guosheng, YANG Zhi, et al. Geological concepts, characteristics, resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon: On unconventional petroleum geology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4): 385-399.

[2]
李秀清, 白蓉, 周红飞, 等. 川中地区侏罗系致密储层渗流规律[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2024, 47(5): 21-28.

DOI

LI Xiuqing, BAI Rong, ZHOU Hongfei, et al. Flow patterns of the Jurassic tight reservoirs, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2024, 47(5): 21-28.

DOI

[3]
徐思阳, 刘岩, 李可赛. 致密砂岩气藏地层水对含气性响应机理分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区下石盒子组气藏为例[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2022, 45(2): 81-91.

XU Siyang, LIU Yan, LI Kesai. Mechanism of formation- water property responding to gas saturation in tight sandstone gas reservoirs: Examples from Lower Shihezi gas reservoirs, Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2022, 45(2): 81-91.

[4]
周克明, 袁小玲, 刘婷芝, 等. 四川盆地公山庙油田中侏罗统沙溪庙组一段致密油藏流体渗流特征[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2024, 47(1): 73-82.

DOI

ZHOU Keming, YUAN Xiaoling, LIU Tingzhi, et al. Fluid flow behaviors in tight reservoirs of the Middle Jurassic Shaximiao 1 Member, Gongshanmiao oilfield, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2024, 47(1): 73-82.

DOI

[5]
龙盛芳, 王玉善, 李国良, 等. 苏里格气田苏49区块盒8下亚段致密储层非均质性特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.

DOI

LONG Shengfang, WANG Yushan, LI Guoliang, et al. Heterogeneity characteristics of tight reservoir of lower submember of He 8 member in Su 49 block, Sulige gas field[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(2): 59-69.

DOI

[6]
OKUNUWADJE S. E., MACDONALD D., BOWDEN S.. Diagenetic and reservoir quality variation of Miocene sandstone reservoir analogues from three basins of Southern California, USA[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2020, 31(5): 930-949.

[7]
刘小洪, 罗静兰, 郭彦如, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区上三叠统延长组长6油层组的成岩相与储层分布[J]. 地质通报, 2008, 27(5): 626-632.

LIU Xiaohong, LUO Jinglan, GUO Yanru, et al. Diagenetic facies and distribution of the Chang 6 reservoir group of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the northern Shaanxi area, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2008, 27(5): 626-632.

[8]
刘小洪, 罗静兰, 刘新菊, 等. 西峰油田长8和长6储层物性影响因素分析[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 39(1): 102-108.

LIU Xiaohong, LUO Jinglan, LIU Xinju, et al. Analysis of influence factors on sandstone reservoirs of the Chang 8 and Chang 6 members in Xifeng Oil Field, southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 39(1): 102-108.

[9]
RAILSBACK L. B.. Carbonate diagenetic facies in the Upper Pennsylvanian Dennis Formation in Iowa, Missouri, and Kansas[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1984, 54(3): 986-999.

[10]
GRIGSBY J. D., LANGFORD R. P.. Effects of diagenesis on enhanced-resolution bulk density logs in Tertiary Gulf Coast sandstones: An example from the Lower Vicksburg Formation, McAllen Ranch Field, South Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1996, 80(11): 1801-1819.

[11]
KHAN S. H., SHENG Y. M., CRITELLI S., et al. Depositional and diagenetic controls on reservoir properties of the lower Cambrian Khewra Sandstone, eastern salt range, Sub-Himalaya, Pakistan[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2024, 161: 106651.

[12]
于海跃, 肖冬生, 王波. 吐哈盆地深层、超深层致密砂岩成岩作用及成岩相——以丘东洼陷J7井区三工河组二段为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2024, 31(3): 369-378.

YU Haiyue, XIAO Dongsheng, WANG Bo. Diagenesis and diagenetic facies of deep and ultra deep tight sandstone in Turpan-Hami Basin: A case study of the second member of Sangonghe Formation in the J7 well area, Qiudong Subsag[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2024, 31(3): 369-378.

[13]
BJØRLYKKE K., JAHREN J.. Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(12): 2193-2214.

[14]
BJØRLYKKE K.. Relationships between depositional environments, burial history and rock properties. Some principal aspects of diagenetic process in sedimentary basins[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2014, 301: 1-14.

[15]
祝海华, 张秋霞, 董国栋, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段重力流砂岩长石溶蚀特征及控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(1): 102-113.

DOI

ZHU Haihua, ZHANG Qiuxia, DONG Guodong, et al. Characteristics and control factors of feldspar dissolution in gravity flow sandstone of Chang 7 Member, Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(1): 102-113.

[16]
杨飞, 申志超, 杜江民, 等. 有机酸对致密砂岩中黏土矿物的选择性溶蚀研究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2023, 42(3): 478-490.

YANG Fei, SHEN Zhichao, DU Jiangmin, et al. Selective dissolution of clay minerals in tight sandstone by organic acids[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2023, 42(3): 478-490.

[17]
张朝军, 雷振宇, 杨晓萍, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地石油勘探领域与目标选择[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2001, 6(1): 38-45.

ZHANG Chaojun, LEI Zhenyu, YANG Xiaoping, et al. Oil exploration area and target selection in Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2001, 6(1): 38-45.

[18]
李元昊, 杨桂茹, 彭建, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地前侏罗纪古地貌形成演化及沉积充填特征[J]. 世界地质, 2020, 39(1): 56-71.

LI Yuanhao, YANG Guiru, PENG Jian, et al. Formation and evolution of pre-Jurassic palaeogeomorphology and characteristics of sedimentary filling in Ordos Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2020, 39(1): 56-71.

[19]
罗安湘, 喻建, 刘显阳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界石油勘探实践及主要认识[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(3): 253-260.

LUO Anxiang, YU Jian, LIU Xianyang, et al. Practices and cognitions of petroleum exploration in Mesozoic, Ordos Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(3): 253-260.

[20]
李兆雨, 李文厚, 吴越, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区延长组长8油层组储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 50(2): 193-203.

LI Zhaoyu, LI Wenhou, WU Yue, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of Chang 8 Reservoir of the Jiyuan Area in the Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 193-203.

[21]
李渊, 丁熊, 王兴志, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8段浅水三角洲砂体结构特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(1): 57-72.

LI Yuan, DING Xiong, WANG Xingzhi, et al. Structural characteristics of sand bodies in shallow-water deltas in the Chang 8 Member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(1): 57-72.

[22]
王哲, 曹广胜, 白玉杰, 等. 低渗透油藏提高采收率技术现状及展望[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(1): 1-13.

DOI

WANG Zhe, CAO Guangsheng, BAI Yujie, et al. Development status and prospect of EOR technology in low-permeability reservoirs[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(1): 1-13.

[23]
李元昊, 刘池洋, 独育国, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西北部上三叠统延长组长8油层组浅水三角洲沉积特征及湖岸线控砂[J]. 古地理学报, 2009, 11(3): 265-274.

LI Yuanhao, LIU Chiyang, DU Yuguo, et al. Sedimentary characteristics of shallow water delta and lake shoreline control on sandbodies of Chang 8 oil-bearing interval of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in northwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2009, 11(3): 265-274.

[24]
楚美娟, 郭正权, 白嫦娥, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长81油层浅水三角洲沉积模式[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013, 35(6): 10-16.

CHU Meijuan, GUO Zhengquan, BAI Chang’e, et al. Sedimentary modes of shallow water delta of Chang 81 reservoir in Yanchang Formation of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2013, 35(6): 10-16.

[25]
邓秀芹, 蔺昉晓, 刘显阳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组沉积演化及其与早印支运动关系的探讨[J]. 古地理学报, 2008, 10(2): 159-166.

DENG Xiuqin, LIN Fangxiao, LIU Xianyang, et al. Discussion on relationship between sedimentary evolution of the Triassic Yanchang Formation and the early Indosinian Movement in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2008, 10(2): 159-166.

[26]
王朝, 王冠民, 杨清宇, 等. 吴起—志丹地区延长组下组合浊沸石的纵向分布特征与成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1247-1260.

WANG Zhao, WANG Guanmin, YANG Qingyu, et al. Vertical characteristics and genesis of laumontite in lower combination of Yanchang group in Wuqi-Zhidan area[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(5): 1247-1260.

[27]
WANG W. R., YUE D. L., ERIKSSON K. A., et al. Spatial variations in diagenetic facies in tight sandstones from sublacustrine-fan deposits: Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2023, 156: 106446.

[28]
邵晓州, 李勇, 张文选, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北地区长8致密砂岩流体包裹体特征与石油成藏[J]. 中国地质, 2023, 50(5): 1299-1310.

SHAO Xiaozhou, LI Yong, ZHANG Wenxuan, et al. The fluid inclusion characteristics and petroleum accumulation of Chang 8 tight sandstone in northern Shaanxi, Ordos Basin[J]. Geology in China, 2023, 50(5): 1299-1310.

[29]
杨智, 付金华, 郭秋麟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组陆相致密油发现、特征及潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(6): 9-15.

DOI

YANG Zhi, FU Jinhua, GUO Qiulin, et al. Discovery, characteristics and resource potential of continental tight oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(6): 9-15.

DOI

[30]
李文厚, 刘溪, 张倩, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中晚三叠世延长期沉积演化[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 49(4): 605-621.

LI Wenhou, LIU Xi, ZHANG Qian, et al. Deposition evolution of Middle-Late Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 49(4): 605-621.

[31]
CUI J. W., ZHU R. K., LI S., et al. Development patterns of source rocks in the depression lake basin and its influence on oil accumulation: Case study of the Chang 7 member of the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 4(4): 191-204.

[32]
代林锋, 陈世加, 王攀, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段致密砂岩储层物性差异对含油性的影响[J]. 世界石油工业, 2023, 30(3): 42-52.

DAI Linfeng, CHEN Shijia, WANG Pan, et al. Effect of physical properties difference on oil content for tight sandstone reservoirs in Chang 7 member of Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2023, 30(3): 42-52.

[33]
HOUSEKNECHT D. W.. Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(6): 633-642.

[34]
代金友, 张一伟, 熊琦华, 等. 成岩作用对储集层物性贡献比率研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(4): 54-55.

DAI Jinyou, ZHANG Yiwei, XIONG Qihua, et al. Effects of diagenesis on reservoir property and quality, a case study of the Cainan Oilfield in east of Zhun Ga’er Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(4): 54-55.

[35]
LIU K., WANG R., SHI W. Z., et al. Diagenetic controls on reservoir quality and heterogeneity of the Triassic Chang 8 tight sandstones in the Binchang area (Ordos Basin, China)[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2022, 146: 105974.

[36]
张哨楠, 丁晓琪. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组致密砂岩储层特征及其成因[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 37(4): 386-394.

ZHANG Shaonan, DING Xiaoqi. Characters and causes of tight sandstones of Yanchang Formation in southern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 37(4): 386-394.

[37]
张琴, 朱筱敏, 钟大康, 等. 山东东营凹陷古近系碎屑岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 古地理学报, 2004, 6(4): 493-502.

ZHANG Qin, ZHU Xiaomin, ZHONG Dakang, et al. Clastic reservoir properties and their controlling factors of the Paleogene in Dongying Sag, Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2004, 6(4): 493-502.

[38]
雷涛, 王桥, 任广磊, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地山西组致密砂岩成分特征及其对储层的制约——以大牛地气田A区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(3): 418-430.

DOI

LEI Tao, WANG Qiao, REN Guanglei, et al. Component characteristics of Shanxi Formation tight sandstone and their implications for the reservoirs in Ordos Basin: Taking the A block of Daniudi Gas Field as an example[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2023, 34(3): 418-430.

DOI

[39]
AASE N. E., BJØRKUM P. A., NADEAU P. H.. The effect of grain-coating microquartz on preservation of reservoir porosity[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1996, 80(10): 1654-1673.

[40]
贾军红, 余光明, 李姝蔓, 等. 低渗油藏注水井欠注问题主控因素分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地长8段油藏为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(6): 892-898.

JIA Junhong, YU Guangming, LI Shuman, et al. Analysis of key controlling factors for water injection deficiency in low-permeability oil reservoirs: A case study of Chang-8 reservoir in Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 892-898.

文章导航

/

[an error occurred while processing this directive]