[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

天然气勘探与开发 >

2022 , Vol. 45 >Issue 4: 103 - 110

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2022.04.013

非常规油气

川东北地区沙溪庙组致密砂岩气井产能主控因素探讨

  • 徐明星 ,
  • 任洪明 ,
  • 胥伟冲 ,
  • 李明秋 ,
  • 张晓丽 ,
  • 杜磊 ,
  • 李咏洲 ,
  • 伍虹莉
展开
  • 1.中国石油西南油气田公司川东北气矿;
    2.中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院
徐明星,男,1984年生,工程师;主要从事气田开发研究工作。地址：（635000）四川省达州市西外凤凰大道436号。E-mail：xumx10@petrochina.com.cn

修回日期: 2022-06-13

  网络出版日期: 2023-02-06

收起

Main factors controlling productivity of tight sandstone gas wells in Shaximiao Formation, Northeastern Sichuan Basin

  • Xu Mingxing ,
  • Ren Hongming ,
  • Xu Weichong ,
  • Li Mingqiu ,
  • Zhang Xiaoli ,
  • Du Lei ,
  • Li Yongzhou ,
  • Wu Hongli
Expand
  • 1. Northeastern Sichuan Gas District, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Dazhou, Sichuan 635000, China;
    2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Revised date: 2022-06-13

  Online published: 2023-02-06

Fold

摘要

四川盆地东北部地区致密气藏地质特征复杂,开发过程中储量动用率低,效益开发难度大,勘探开发范围难以拓展。以川东北地区五宝场沙溪庙组致密气藏为例,储层物性整体表现为低孔隙度、特低渗透率特征,储层孔隙度仅5.61%,岩心渗透率主要分布在10-4~10-1 mD之间,相较于四川盆地内其他沙溪庙组致密气藏更为致密。对此详细分析气藏成藏条件,明确气井的产能主控因素及高产机制,以指导气藏下步的科学高效开发。研究结果表明：①气藏是以曲流河—三角洲沉积为主的红色砂泥岩系,具备充足的烃源供给基础,具有相互叠置的储集砂体、沟通烃源岩与储集砂体的断层以及一定规模的封闭盖层,为形成致密岩性气藏提供了有利条件。②储层物性及有效厚度仍是决定气井产能的主要因素。③裂缝是气井高产的重要因素。首先,气藏高产井主要沿裂缝发育的构造轴部分布;其次,烃源断裂是高产气井发育的关键,即在沟通烃源岩与储集砂体之间的断层附近,发育高产井;第三,通过储层压裂改造实现人工造缝,可在一定程度上提高单井产能。在对致密气藏进行气井产能主控因素研究的基础上,提出了下步寻找裂缝发育有利区及结合纵向多套砂体叠置的特点实施立体综合开发的勘探开发思路。

关键词： 五宝场地区; 沙溪庙组; 致密气; 成藏条件; 气井产能; 产能控制因素

本文引用格式

徐明星 , 任洪明 , 胥伟冲 , 李明秋 , 张晓丽 , 杜磊 , 李咏洲 , 伍虹莉 . 川东北地区沙溪庙组致密砂岩气井产能主控因素探讨[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2022 , 45(4) : 103 -110 . DOI: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2022.04.013

Abstract

Tight gas reservoirs in northeastern Sichuan Basin are complex geologically, leading to low producing rate of reserves and difficulties in profitable development and expanding the scope of exploration and development. In this study, the tight gas reservoirs of Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang were discussed as examples. The reservoirs are generally characterized by low porosity and ultra-low permeability, with the porosity of only 5.61% and the core permeability ranging from 0.0001 mD to 0.1 mD. They are tighter than other tight gas reservoirs of Shaximiao Formation in the basin. The reservoir-forming conditions were analyzed, and the main factors controlling productivity and high-yield mechanisms of gas wells were clearly defined, to guide the subsequent scientific and efficient development. Results show that the reservoirs are a red sand-mudstone system dominated by meandering river-delta sediments, indicating a sufficient hydrocarbon source supply basis. There are superimposed reservoir sand bodies, faults connecting source rocks with reservoir sand bodies, and a certain scale of closed caprocks, which provide favorable conditions for the formation of tight lithologic gas reservoirs. Reservoir physical properties and effective thickness are still the key factors determining the productivity of gas wells. And fracture is the important factor for high production. First of all, high-yield gas wells are mainly deployed along the structural axis where fractures are developed. Secondly, hydrocarbon source faults are crucial to high-yield gas wells, that is, high production can be achieved in the area near the faults connecting source rocks with reservoir sand bodies. Finally, artificial fractures are induced by reservoir fracturing to enhance single-well productivity to a certain extent. Based on the research of the main factors controlling productivity, it is proposed to seek favorable zone for fracture development and implement three-dimensional comprehensive development depending on the characteristics of vertical superimposition of multiple sand bodies.

Key words： Wubaochang area; Shaximiao Formation; Tight gas; Reservoir-forming condition; Gas well productivity; Controlling factor of productivity

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

[1] 邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 173-187.
Zou Caineng, Zhu Rukai, Wu Songtao, et al.Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations: taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 173-187.
[2] 康玉柱. 中国非常规油气勘探重大进展和资源潜力[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2018, 37(4): 1-7.
Kang Yuzhu.Significant exploration progress and resource potential of unconventional oil and gas in China[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2018, 37(4): 1-7.
[3] 王世谦, 胡素云, 董大忠. 川东侏罗系——四川盆地亟待重视的一个致密油气新领域[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(12): 22-29.
Wang Shiqian, Hu Suyun & Dong Dazhong. Jurassic tight oil & gas resources in East Sichuan Basin: A new exploration target[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(12): 22-29.
[4] 聂海宽, 马鑫, 余川, 等. 川东下侏罗统自流井组页岩储层特征及勘探潜力评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(3): 438-447.
Nie Haikuan, Ma Xin, Yu Chuan, et al.Shale gas reservoir characteristics and its exploration potential-analysis on the Lower Jurassic shale in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(3): 438-447.
[5] 梁狄刚, 冉隆辉, 戴弹申, 等. 四川盆地中北部侏罗系大面积非常规石油勘探潜力的再认识[J]. 石油学报, 2011, 32(1): 8-17.
Liang Digang, Ran Longhui, Dai Danshen, et al.A re-recognition of the prospecting potential of Jurassic large-area and non-conventional oils in the central-northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011, 32(1): 8-17.
[6] 毛嘉宾, 严维理, 费怀义, 等. 川东北五宝场构造沙溪庙组储层特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2007, 17(5): 8-10.
Mao Jiabin, Yan Weili, Fei Huaiyi, et al.Reservoir characteristics of Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang structure, northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 17(5): 8-10.
[7] 李建林, 王威, 罗爱军, 等. 川东五宝场地区沙溪庙组沉积相及储层物性[J]. 断块油气田, 2008, 15(3): 23-26.
Li Jianlin, Wang Wei, Luo Aijun, et al.Sedimentary facies and reservoir physical property of Shaximiao Formation in Wubaochang Area, East Sichuan[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2008, 15(3): 23-26.
[8] 任洪明, 徐明星, 宋小琼, 等. 五宝场含气构造沙溪庙组气藏开发潜力研究[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2015, 9(6): 17-20.
Ren Hongming, Xu Mingxing, Song Xiaoqiong, et al.Development potential of Shaximiao Formation gas reservoir, Wubaochang structure[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2015, 9(6): 17-20.
[9] 肖富森, 黄东, 张本健, 等. 四川盆地侏罗系沙溪庙组天然气地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 568-576.
Xiao Fusen, Huang Dong, Zhang Benjian, et al.Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of natural gas in Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(5): 568-576.
[10] 李军, 陶士振, 汪泽成, 等. 川东北地区侏罗系油气地质特征与成藏主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(5): 732-741.
Li Jun, Tao Shizhen, Wang Zecheng, et al.Characteristics of Jurassic petroleum geology and main factors of hydrocarbon accumulation in NE Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21(5): 732-741.
[11] 唐大海, 陈洪斌, 谢继容, 等. 四川盆地西部侏罗系沙溪庙组气藏成藏条件[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2005, 28(3): 14-19.
Tang Dahai, Chen Hongbin, Xie Jirong, et al.Reservoir forming conditions of Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, west Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2005, 28(3): 14-19.
[12] 郑荣才, 李国晖, 戴朝成, 等. 四川类前陆盆地盆—山耦合系统和沉积学响应[J]. 地质学报. 2012, 86(1): 170-180.
Zheng Rongcai, Li Guohui, Dai Chaocheng, et al.Basin-mountain coupling system and its sedimentary response in Sichuan analogous foreland basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(1): 170-180.
[13] 曾焱, 黎华继, 周文雅, 等. 川西坳陷东坡中江气田沙溪庙组复杂“窄”河道致密砂岩气藏高产富集规律[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2017, 40(4): 1-8.
Zeng Yan, Li Huaji, Zhou Wenya, et al.High-yield enrichment laws of Shaximiao Formation tight sandstone gas reservoir of complex “narrow” channel in Zhongjiang Gas Field, in the eastern slope of West Sichuan Depression[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2017, 40(4): 1-8.
[14] 叶见玲, 李忠权, 张燕. 五宝场沙溪庙组裂缝成因分析[J]. 四川地质学报, 2011, 31(2): 162-166.
Ye Jianling, Li Zhongquan & Zhang Yan. On the genesis of fissures in the Shaximiao Formation, Wubaochang[J]. Acta Geologica Sichuan, 2011, 31(2): 162-166.
[15] 李蒙, 商晓飞, 赵华伟, 等. 基于likelihood地震属性的致密气藏断裂预测——以四川盆地川西坳陷新场地区须二段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(6): 1299-1309.
Li Meng, Shang Xiaofei, Zhao Huawei, et al.Prediction of fractures in tight gas reservoirs based on likelihood attribute —A case study of the 2nd member of Xujiahe Formation in Xinchang area, Western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2020, 41(6): 1299-1309.
[16] 刘忠群, 秦锐, 郝前勇, 等. 泾河油田长8致密油藏地震Likelihood裂缝预测[J]. 成都理工大学学报 (自然科学版), 2016, 43(5): 609-616.
Liu Zhongqun, Qin Rui, Hao Qianyong, et al.Seismic Likelihood fracture prediction technology for Chang-8 tight oil reservoir in Jinghe oil field, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(5): 609-616.
[17] 王莹, 张克银, 甘其刚, 等. 四川盆地西部新场地区上三叠统须家河组二段构造裂缝的分布规律[J]. 地质学刊, 2015, 39(4): 543-551.
Wang Ying, Zhang Keyin, Gan Qigang, et al.Distribution rules of structural fractures in the second member of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Xinchang area, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Geology, 2015, 39(4): 543-551.
[18] 李虎, 范存辉, 秦启荣, 等. 川东北元坝中部地区须家河组致密储层裂缝特征及成因探讨[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(2): 1-6.
Li Hu, Fan Cunhui, Qin Qirong, et al.Fracture characteristics and its genesis of tight reservoir in Xujiahe formation of central Yuanba area in Sichuan basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(2): 1-6.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]