[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

天然气勘探与开发 >

2023 , Vol. 46 >Issue 4: 57 - 68

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2023.04.006

资源勘探

川东地区茅一段储层地质特征及勘探潜力分析——以XT1井为例

  • 李亚 ,
  • 钟佳倚 ,
  • 汪华 ,
  • 戴鑫 ,
  • 安虹伊
展开
  • 1.中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院
    2.中国石油西南油气田公司勘探事业部
李亚,女,1989年生,工程师,硕士;主要从事四川盆地二叠系天然气地质综合研究工作。地址：（610041）四川省成都市高新区天府大道北段12号。E-mail：lya@petrochina.com.cn

修回日期: 2023-07-07

  网络出版日期: 2023-12-20

基金资助

中国石油西南油气田公司科学与技术开发项目“四川盆地二叠系资源潜力与成藏条件研究”（编号：20220301-03-01）

收起

Geological characteristics and exploration prospects of the first member of Maokou Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin: An example from XT1 well

  • LI Ya ,
  • ZHONG Jiayi ,
  • WANG Hua ,
  • DAI Xin ,
  • AN Hongyi
Expand
  • 1. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China;
    2. Exploration Division, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China;

Revised date: 2023-07-07

  Online published: 2023-12-20

Fold

摘要

在以往的勘探实践中,四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段（简称茅一段）长期被视为一套碳酸盐岩烃源层,未曾针对性地开展储层评价与测试工作。为了进一步明确川东地区茅一段的天然气勘探潜力,以风险探井XT1井岩心资料为研究对象,通过物性测试、薄片鉴定、电镜扫描、有机地球化学分析等技术手段,综合开展矿物岩石学和地球化学分析,以获取川东地区茅一段的储层特征及烃源特征。研究成果表明：①川东地区茅一段以中层状、中—薄层状深灰—灰黑色含泥质泥晶生屑灰岩、泥灰岩与中厚—厚层状灰—深灰色泥晶生屑灰岩、含泥质泥晶生屑灰岩为主,沉积水体深度较大;泥晶生屑灰岩及含泥质泥晶生屑灰岩、泥灰岩互层形成的“眼球状构造”发育。②XT1井茅一段储层岩心柱塞样氦气孔隙度分布在0.24%~6.98%,平均为1.39%;渗透率分布在0.001 4~ 1.720 0 mD,平均为0.083 0 mD,属于低孔隙度、低渗透率储层;其中眼皮状构造灰岩（简称为“眼皮灰岩”）物性相对较好,孔隙度分布在0.24%~6.98%,主要储集空间类型为片状滑石晶间微孔、微裂缝;而眼球状构造灰岩（简称为“眼球灰岩”）储集性能较差,孔隙度分布在0.24%~3.41%,储层不发育。③XT1井茅一段眼皮灰岩具有一定的生烃能力,总有机质含量（TOC）分布在0.17%~1.63%;川东地区茅一段烃源岩厚度多大于80 m,具有良好的生烃条件。④川东地区茅一段可形成自生自储、多元供烃的含泥质灰岩、泥灰岩气藏,勘探有利分布面积大于2×104 km2,预测资源量超过2 000×108 m3,具有较大的勘探潜力。

关键词： 四川盆地; 川东地区; 茅一段; 储层特征; 烃源特征; 勘探潜力

本文引用格式

李亚 , 钟佳倚 , 汪华 , 戴鑫 , 安虹伊 . 川东地区茅一段储层地质特征及勘探潜力分析——以XT1井为例[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2023 , 46(4) : 57 -68 . DOI: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2023.04.006

Abstract

The first member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation (Maokou 1 Member) in Sichuan Basin was always regarded as a set of carbonate source rocks not as reservoirs for evaluation in previous exploration practices. So, XT1well, one risk exploration well, was taken as an objective to deeply figure out the natural-gas exploration potential of Maokou 1 Member in eastern basin. Moreover, both mineral petrology and geochemistry were explored on the basis of core data through some methods, like physical property testing, thin section identification, and scanning electron microscope and organic geochemical analysis. Finally, characteristics as both reservoir rocks and source rocks were gained. Results show that (i) this member in eastern Sichuan Basin is dominated by medium or thin-medium layered dark-gray to gray-black argillaceous micritic bioclastic limestone and marlstone, and medium-thick to thick layered gray to dark-gray micritic bioclastic limestone and argillaceous micritic bioclastic limestone. Its depositional waterbody is relatively deep. A kind of “eyeball structure”, which is formed by the interbedded micritic bioclastic limestone, argillaceous micritic bioclastic limestone and marlstone, is developed; (ii) for core plugs , their helium porosity ranges from 0.24% to 6.98%, 1.39% on average, and the permeability from 0.0014 mD to 1.72 mD, 0.083 mD on average, respectively, belonging to low-porosity and low-permeability reservoirs. Among which, the eyelid-shaped limestone boasts better physical properties, for example the porosity between 0.24% and 6.98%, and the reservoir space mainly consisting of sheet-like talc intercrystalline micropores and microfractures. While the eyeball limestone possesses poor storage performance with the porosity from 0.24% to 3.41%, resulting that this sort of reservoir rocks is not developed; (iii) with TOC between 0.17% and 1.63%, the eyelid limestone in this well enjoys certain hydrocarbon-generating ability. The source rocks of Maokou 1 Member in eastern basin are generally thicker than 80 m, thus suggesting good hydrocarbon-generating conditions; (iv) in this area, this member can develop into argillaceous limestone and marlstone gas reservoirs with self-generation and self-storage as well as multiple source rocks with the favorable exploration area of 2×104 km2 and the predicted resources over 2,000×108 m3, displaying large exploration prospects.

Key words： Sichuan Basin; Eastern Sichuan Basin; First member of Maokou Formation; Reservoir characteristics; Source-rock characteristics; Exploration prospect

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

参考文献

[1] 邹才能, 杜金虎, 徐春春, 等. 四川盆地震旦系—寒武系特大型气田形成分布、资源潜力及勘探发现[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(3): 278-293.
ZOU Caineng, DU Jinhu, XU Chunchun, et al.Formation, distribution, resource potential and discovery of the Sinian-Cambrian giant gas field, Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3): 278-293.
[2] 陈宗清. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气勘探[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2007, 12(5): 1-11.
CHEN Zongqing.Exploration for natural gas in Middle Permian Maokou Formation of Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2007, 12(5): 1-11.
[3] 杨光, 汪华, 沈浩, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统储层特征与勘探方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(7): 10-16.
YANG Guang, WANG Hua, SHEN Hao, et al.Characteristics and exploration prospects of Middle Permian reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(7): 10-16.
[4] 汪华, 沈浩, 黄东, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统热水白云岩成因及其分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(9): 25-32.
WANG Hua, SHEN Hao, HUANG Dong, et al.Origin and distribution of hydrothermal dolomites of the Middle Permian in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(9): 25-32.
[5] 杨雨, 谢继容, 赵路子, 等. 四川盆地茅口组滩相孔隙型白云岩储层天然气勘探的突破及启示——以川中北部地区JT1井天然气立体勘探为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(2): 1-9.
YANG Yu, XIE Jirong, ZHAO Luzi, et al.Breakthrough of natural gas exploration in the beach facies porous dolomite reservoir of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its enlightenment: A case study of the tridimensional exploration of Well JT1 in the central-northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(2): 1-9.
[6] 张亚, 陈双玲, 张晓丽, 等. 四川盆地茅口组岩溶古地貌刻画及油气勘探意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 44-55.
ZHANG Ya, CHEN Shuangling, ZHANG Xiaoli, et al.Restoration of paleokarst geomorphology of Lower Permian Maokou Formation and its petroleum exploration implication in Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3): 44-55.
[7] 明盈, 徐亮, 周刚, 等. 四川盆地南部地区茅口组古岩溶缝洞充填演化特征[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2021, 44(1): 46-54.
MING Ying, XU Liang, ZHOU Gang, et al.Evolution characteristics of paleo-karst fracture and vug filling in Maokou Formation, southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2021, 44(1): 46-54.
[8] 汪泽成, 江青春, 黄士鹏, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组天然气大面积成藏的地质条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(1): 30-38.
WANG Zecheng, JIANG Qingchun, HUANG Shipeng, et al.Geological conditions for massive accumulation of natural gas in the Mid-Permian Maokou Fm of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(1): 30-38.
[9] 范建平, 宋金民, 江青春, 等. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组一段储层特征与形成模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(6): 1413-1430.
FAN Jianping, SONG Jinmin, JIANG Qingchun, et al.Reservoir characteristics and development model of the Middle Permian Mao-1 Member in eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(6): 1413-1430.
[10] 王佳蕊, 宋金民, 刘树根, 等. 川东地区茅口组一段微孔特征及其主控因素[J]. 非常规油气, 2022, 9(3): 32-41.
WANG Jiarui, SONG Jinmin, LIU Shugen, et al.Micropore characteristics and main controlling factors of the Mao1 Member of Maokou Formation in eastern Sichuan[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2022, 9(3): 32-41.
[11] 赵培荣. 焦石坝地区茅一段储层征及天然气勘探潜力[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5): 772-781.
ZHAO Peirong.Reservoir characteristics and gas exploration potential of Permian Mao-1 Member of Maokou Formation in Jiaoshiba area[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 772-781.
[12] 李强, 师江波, 周聪, 等. 四川盆地中部合川—潼南地区茅一段泥灰岩储层特征与评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(12): 1986-1996.
LI Qiang, SHI Jiangbo, ZHOU Cong, et al.Characteristics and evaluation of muddy limestone reservoir in the first member of Maokou Formation of Hechuan-Tongnan area, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(12): 1986-1996.
[13] 孙斌, 张培先, 高全芳, 等. 川东南南川地区茅口组一段碳酸盐岩储层特征及富集模式[J]. 非常规油气, 2022, 9(3): 21-31.
SUN Bin, ZHANG Peixian, GAO Quanfang, et al.Reservoir properties and accumulation mode of carbonate rocks in Mao1 Member of Nanchuan Area in southeast Sichuan[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2022, 9(3): 21-31.
[14] 韩月卿, 郝运轻, 韩文彪, 等. 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组一段眼球状灰岩成因机理[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2022, 29(6): 12-21.
HAN Yueqing, HAO Yunqing, HAN Wenbiao, et al.Genetic mechanism of eyeball-shaped limestone in First Member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in southeast Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2022, 29(6): 12-21.
[15] 陈洪德, 张成弓, 黄福喜, 等. 中上扬子克拉通海西-印支期(泥盆纪—中三叠世)沉积层序充填过程与演化模式[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(8): 2281-2298.
CHEN Hongde, ZHANG Chenggong, HUANG Fuxi, et al.Filling process and evolutionary model of sedimentary sequence of Middle-Upper Yangtze craton in Hercynian-Indosinian (Devonian-Middle Triassic)[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 27(8): 2281-2298.
[16] 周进高, 姚根顺, 杨光, 等. 四川盆地栖霞组—茅口组岩相古地理与天然气有利勘探区带[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 36(4): 8-15.
ZHOU Jingao, YAO Genshun, YANG Guang, et al.Lithofacies palaeogeography and favorable gas exploration zones of Qixia and Maokou Fms in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(4): 8-15.
[17] 田小彬, 师江波, 董景海, 等. 川中地区茅口组一段沉积相新认识——基于最新钻井资料[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(11): 1646-1655.
TIAN Xiaobin, SHI Jiangbo, DONG Jinghai, et al.New understanding of sedimentary facies of the first Member of Maokou Formation based on the latest drilling in central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(11): 1646-1655.
[18] 苏成鹏, 李蓉, 石国山, 等. 四川盆地及周缘中二叠统茅口组一段储集层特征及对油气勘探的启示[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2021, 48(6): 1150-1161.
SU Chengpeng, LI Rong, SHI Guoshan, et al.Reservoir characteristics of the first member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Sichuan Basin and its periphery and inspirations to petroleum exploration, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(6): 1150-1161.
[19] 罗进雄, 何幼斌, 何明薇, 等. 华南中二叠统眼球状石灰岩特征及成因的思考[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(4): 613-626.
LUO Jinxiong, HE Youbin, HE Mingwei, et al.Thoughts on characteristics and origin of the Middle Permian eyeball-shaped limestone in south China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2019, 21(4): 613-626.
[20] 向娟, 胡明毅, 胡忠贵, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组沉积相分析[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2011, 25(1): 14-19.
XIANG Juan, HU Mingyi, HU Zhonggui, et al.Sedimentary facies analysis of Maokou formation of middle Permian in Sichuan basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2011, 25(1): 14-19.
[21] 韩月卿, 李双建, 韩文彪, 等. 川东南地区中二叠统茅口组灰泥灰岩储层孔隙特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(4): 666-676.
HAN Yueqing, LI Shuangjian, HAN Wenbiao, et al.Pore characteristics of marl reservoir in Maokou Formation of Middle Permian, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2022, 44(4): 666-676.
[22] 张培先, 何希鹏, 高全芳, 等. 四川盆地东南缘二叠系茅口组一段页岩气藏地质特征及富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1): 146-157.
ZHANG Peixian, HE Xipeng, GAO Quanfang, et al.Geological characteristics and enrichment pattern of Permian Mao 1 Member shale gas reservoirs at the southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 146-157.
[23] 薛武强, 刘喜停, 颜佳新, 等. 重庆南川地区中二叠统茅口组眼球状灰岩成因[J]. 地质科学, 2015, 50(3): 1001-1013.
XUE Wuqiang, LIU Xiting, YAN Jiaxin, et al.The origin of eyeball-shaped limestone from Maokou Formation (Mid-Permian) in Nanchuan region, Chongqing, Southwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2015, 50(3): 1001-1013.
[24] 罗进雄, 何幼斌. 中—上扬子地区二叠系眼球状石灰岩特征及成因研究[J]. 地质论评, 2010, 56(5): 629-637.
LUO Jinxiong, HE Youbin.Origin and characteristics of Permian eyeball-shaped limestones in Middle-Upper Yangtze Region[J]. Geological Review, 2010, 56(5): 629-637.
[25] 陈军, 徐义刚. 二叠纪大火成岩省的环境与生物效应: 进展与前瞻[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2017, 36(3): 374-393.
CHEN Jun, XU Yigang.Permian large igneous provinces and their impact on paleoenvironment and biodiversity: Progresses and perspectives[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2017, 36(3): 374-393.
[26] 刘杰, 李蔚洋, 何幼斌. 四川旺苍双汇下二叠统茅口组眼球状石灰岩成因分析[J]. 海相油气地质, 2011, 16(1): 63-67.
LIU Jie, LI Weiyang, HE Youbin.Genetic analysis of Lower Permian Maokou augen limestone in Wangcang area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2011, 16(1): 63-67.
[27] 宋金民, 刘树根, 金鑫, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统含海泡石层系源储组合新模式及其油气勘探新领域[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 49(2): 129-149.
SONG Jinmin, LIU Shugen, JIN Xin, et al.A new model of source-reservoir association and new fields of oil and gas exploration in the Middle Permian sepiolite bearing strata, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2022, 49(2): 129-149.
[28] 胡东风, 王良军, 张汉荣, 等. 碳酸盐岩烃源岩气藏的发现及其油气地质意义——以四川盆地涪陵地区中二叠统茅口组一段气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(7): 23-33.
HU Dongfeng, WANG Liangjun, ZHANG Hanrong, et al.Discovery of carbonate source rock gas reservoir and its petroleum geological implications: A case study of the gas reservoir in the first Member of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in the Fuling area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(7): 23-33.
[29] 江青春, 汪泽成, 苏旺, 等. 四川盆地中二叠统茅口组一段泥灰岩源内非常规天然气成藏条件及有利勘探方向[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(6): 82-97.
JIANG Qingchun, WANG Zecheng, SU Wang, et al.Accumulation conditions and favorable exploration orientation of unconventional natural gas in the marl source rock of the first member of the Middle Permian Maokou Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(6): 82-97.
[30] 戴金星, 倪云燕, 黄士鹏. 四川盆地黄龙组烷烃气碳同位素倒转成因的探讨[J]. 石油学报, 2010, 31(5): 710-717.
DAI Jinxing, NI Yunyan, HUANG Shipeng.Discussion on the carbon isotopic reversal of alkane gases from the Huanglong Formation in the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2010, 31(5): 710-717.
[31] 徐祖新. 川东地区中二叠统茅口组天然气成因及气源[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(2): 16-22.
XU Zuxin.Genesis and source of gas in Middle Permian Maokou Formation of eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(2): 16-22.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉

[an error occurred while processing this directive]