[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]Natural Gas Exploration and Development >
2025 , Vol. 48 >Issue 1: 50 - 56
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2025.01.006
Experimental study and field test of CO2 fracturing mechanism
Received date: 2024-07-03
Revised date: 2024-10-31
Online published: 2025-03-04
To reveal the fracture initiation mechanism in CO2 fracturing, experiments and tests were conducted with small-sized and large-sized rock samples, and large-scale fields through large-scale physical simulation experiment of CO2 fracturing, X-ray diffraction (XRD) detection, rock mechanics testing, rock sample CT scanning, and interpretations of water hammer pressure response and downhole microseismic fracture monitoring during on-site fracturing. The results are obtained in five aspects. First, supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) has an extremely strong capability of filtration and penetration in rocks, and the area of the artificial fractures it causes is much smaller than that formed by conventional hydraulic fracturing. Second, CO2 has a significant dissolution effect on calcite and dolomite in rocks, leading to a decrease in the Young’s modulus, shear modulus, and compressive strength of rocks, and an increase in rock brittleness index. Third, affected by the CO2 soaking, the fracture surface formed after rock rupture is relatively rough and poorly integrated. Such fractures show a good conductivity even without proppants, achieving self-propping of artificial fractures. Fourth, the instantaneous pump-off pressure of CO2 fracturing exhibits small-amplitude and long-duration fluctuations, and its pressure conduction behaviors are distinctly different from those of conventional hydraulic fracturing. Fifth, the mixed fracturing mechanism of SC-CO2 fracturing provides a good explanation for the phenomena of less acoustic emission signals in physical simulation experiments of CO2 fracturing, and fewer microseismic events in field tests, proving the rationality of the mixed fracturing mechanism. It is concluded that the fractures initiated by CO2 fracturing, with no proppant added, can achieve good stimulation performance, proving the rationality of the self-propping theory of CO2 fracturing.
SU Weidong , ZHOU Ran , YE Wenyong , LI Yong , DU Yan , ZHANG Chengwu , HE Xinyan . Experimental study and field test of CO2 fracturing mechanism[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2025 , 48(1) : 50 -56 . DOI: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2025.01.006
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
王振铎, 王晓泉, 卢拥军. 二氧化碳泡沫压裂技术在低渗透低压气藏中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2004, 25(3): 66-70.
|
[5] |
才博, 王欣, 蒋廷学, 等. 液态CO2压裂技术在煤层气压裂中的应用[J]. 天然气技术, 2007, 1(5): 40-42.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
苏伟东, 宋振云, 马得华, 等. 二氧化碳干法压裂技术在苏里格气田的应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2011, 34(4): 39-40.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
贾云中. 超临界二氧化碳压裂页岩自支撑裂缝形成机理及渗透性—稳定性研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2018.
|
[14] |
汤勇, 胡世莱, 汪勇, 等. “注入—压裂—返排”全过程的CO2相态特征——以鄂尔多斯盆地神木气田致密砂岩气藏SH52井为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(9): 58-64.
|
[15] |
吴春方, 窦亮彬, 刘建坤. CO2干法压裂井筒压力与相态控制研究[J]. 石油机械, 2019, 47(7): 71-79.
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
李政, 常旭, 姚振兴, 等. 微地震方法的裂缝监测与储层评价[J]. 地球物理学报, 2019, 62(2): 707-719.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
孙文超. 超临界二氧化碳增粘剂及其作用机制研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2018.
|
[24] |
闫若勤, 赵明伟, 李阳, 等. 二氧化碳压裂液增稠剂研究进展[J]. 油田化学, 2022, 39(2): 366-372.
|
[25] |
汪小宇, 宋振云, 王所良. CO2干法压裂液体系的研究与试验[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2014, 36(6): 69-73.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |