致密砂岩压裂后的储层敏感性特征实验&#x02014;&#x02014;以四川盆地JQ地区沙溪庙组8号砂体为例

汪煜昆; 赵丹; 刘婷芝; 淦文杰; 王永强; 张清秀; 郭静姝

doi:10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2024.03.010

天然气勘探与开发 >

2024 , Vol. 47 >Issue 3: 85 - 93

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2024.03.010

非常规油气

致密砂岩压裂后的储层敏感性特征实验——以四川盆地JQ地区沙溪庙组8号砂体为例

汪煜昆 ,
赵丹 ,
刘婷芝 ,
淦文杰 ,
王永强 ,
张清秀 ,
郭静姝

展开

1.中国石油西南油气田公司川中油气矿四川遂宁 629000;
2.中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院四川成都 610041

汪煜昆,男,1992年生,工程师;主要从事油气藏开发研究工作。地址：（629000）四川省遂宁市河东新区香林南路178号。E-mail：wyk2016@petrochina.com.cn

赵丹,男,1991年生,工程师,硕士;主要从事油气田开发研究工作。地址：（610041）四川省成都市天府大道北段12号。E-mail：zhaodan2017@petrochina.com.cn

修回日期: 2024-04-14

网络出版日期: 2024-06-27

收起

Experimental study on reservoir sensitivity characteristics of tight sandstone after fracturing: Taking No.8 sand body of Shaximiao Formation in JQ area of Sichuan Basin as an example

WANG Yukun ,
ZHAO Dan ,
LIU Tingzhi ,
GAN Wenjie ,
WANG Yongqiang ,
ZHANG Qingxiu ,
GUO Jingshu

Expand

1. Central Sichuan Oil and Gas District, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Suining, Sichuan 629000, China;
2. Exploration and Development Research Institute, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Revised date: 2024-04-14

Online published: 2024-06-27

Fold

摘要

随着油气勘探开发向非常规领域深入,压裂等储层改造措施的应用越来越广泛。为了深入认识储层特性,了解储层潜力,预测储层改造后敏感性特征变化,从而进行合理的储层保护措施,有必要开展储层岩心模拟改造后的敏感性实验,明确储层改造措施对储层敏感性特征的影响。基于钻井获取岩心,在薄片鉴定、X射线衍射、扫描电镜分析以及压汞测试实验等手段的基础上,开展不同压力、温度、流体化学性质等条件下的流动实验,以评估储层的敏感性特征。通过对比改造前后岩心敏感性实验结果的差异,分析储层改造措施对储层敏感性特征的影响。结果表明：①模拟储层改造后中侏罗统沙溪庙组8号砂体岩心出现网状裂缝,渗透率相比改造前平均提升167%。②改造之前的JQ地区沙溪庙组岩心具有中等偏弱速敏、强水敏、弱盐敏、弱碱敏、弱酸敏的特征;改造后,速敏、盐敏等敏感性特征没有改变,而水敏由强转弱,强水敏的样品比例由93%下降到17%。③综合分析改造后敏感性特征,改造后岩心的水敏程度较改造前下降,出现弱水敏和无水敏的结果,因此需要增加储层改造措施的影响范围,以此提升储层流体流动能力。

关键词： 致密砂岩; 渗流实验; 储层改造; 敏感性特征; CT扫描

本文引用格式

汪煜昆 , 赵丹 , 刘婷芝 , 淦文杰 , 王永强 , 张清秀 , 郭静姝 . 致密砂岩压裂后的储层敏感性特征实验——以四川盆地JQ地区沙溪庙组8号砂体为例[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2024 , 47(3) : 85 -93 . DOI: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2024.03.010

Abstract

With the expansion of hydrocarbon exploration into unconventional fields, the reservoir stimulation treatments such as fracturing are increasingly applied. For purposes of understanding reservoir properties, figuring out reservoir potential, predicting the changes in reservoir sensitivity characteristics after stimulation, and then implementing appropriate reservoir protection, it is necessary to conduct sensitivity experiments on reservoir cores after simulated stimulation in order to identify how the stimulation affects the reservoir sensitivity characteristics. Through thin section identification, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and mercury injection test, flow experiments were carried out for drilled cores under different pressures, temperatures and fluid chemical properties to evaluate the reservoir sensitivity characteristics. The results of sensitivity experiments on cores before and after stimulation were compared to analyze the impacts of stimulation treatment on reservoir sensitivity characteristics. The results are shown as follows: (i) There appears netlike fractures in the cores drilled from No.8 sand body of the Middle Jurassic Shaximiao Formation in the JQ area of Sichuan Basin after stimulation, and the core permeability is 167% higher averagely than that before stimulation. (ii) The cores are characterized by moderate to weak velocity sensitivity, strong water sensitivity, weak salt sensitivity, weak alkali sensitivity, and weak acid sensitivity. After stimulation, the characteristics of velocity sensitivity and salt sensitivity remain unchanged, while the strong water sensitivity changes to a weak level. Moreover, the proportion of core samples with strong water sensitivity reduces to 17% from 93%. (iii) Comprehensive analysis indicates that the stimulated cores present a reduced level of water sensitivity, which manifests as weak or zero water sensitivity. Thus, the coverage of reservoir stimulation treatments needs to be expanded so as to improve the reservoir fluid flow capacity.

Key words： Tight sandstone; Seepage experiment; Reservoir stimulation; Sensitivity characteristics; CT scanning

参考文献

[1] 张道伟, 杨雨. 四川盆地陆相致密砂岩气勘探潜力与发展方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(1): 1-11.
ZHANG Daowei, YANG Yu.Exploration potential and development direction of continental tight sandstone gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(1): 1-11.
[2] 康毅力, 罗平亚. 中国致密砂岩气藏勘探开发关键工程技术现状与展望[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34(2): 239-245.
KANG Yili, LUO Pingya.Current status and prospect of key techniques for exploration and production of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(2): 239-245.
[3] 江蓉蓉, 李涛, 严焕榕, 等. 川西地区侏罗系致密砂岩储层孔喉特征对渗流能力的影响[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2018, 41(2): 63-69.
JIANG Rongrong, LI Tao, YAN Huanrong, et al.Pore-throat characteristics and percolation capacity of Jurassic tight sandstone reservoirs, western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2018, 41(2): 63-69.
[4] 张水昌, 米敬奎, 刘柳红, 等. 中国致密砂岩煤成气藏地质特征及成藏过程——以鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界与四川盆地须家河组气藏为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2009, 36(3): 320-330.
ZHANG Shuichang, MI Jingkui, LIU Liuhong, et al.Geological features and formation of coal-formed tight sandstone gas pools in China: cases from Upper Paleozoic gas pools, Ordos Basin and Xujiahe Formation gas pools, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009, 36(3): 320-330.
[5] 李伟, 王雪柯, 赵容容, 等. 川西前陆盆地上三叠统须家河组致密砂岩气藏超压体系形成演化与天然气聚集关系[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(1): 25-39.
LI Wei, WANG Xueke, ZHAO Rongrong, et al.Formation and evolution of overpressure system in tight sandstone gas reservoir of Xujiahe Formation of Upper Triassic in the Western Sichuan foreland basin and its relationship with natural gas accumulation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(1): 25-39.
[6] 刘曦翔, 张宇, 蒲柏宇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水致密砂岩大气淡水溶蚀及其油气地质意义[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2019, 42(2): 48-55.
LIU Xixiang, ZHANG Yu, PU Boyu, et al.Meteoric water dissolution in deepwater tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin and its geological significance[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2019, 42(2): 48-55.
[7] 戴金星, 倪云燕, 吴小奇. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 257-264.
DAI Jinxing, NI Yunyan, WU Xiaoqi.Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 257-264.
[8] 赵爽, 王琨瑜, 邓虎成. 川西拗陷中侏罗统沙溪庙组致密砂岩成岩相[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2021, 44(2): 113-120.
ZHAO Shuang, WANG Kunyu, DENG Hucheng.Diagenetic facies of tight sandstone in Jurassic Shaximiao Formation, Western Sichuan Depression[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2021, 44(2): 113-120.
[9] MO F., QI Z. L. , YAN W. D. , et al. Reservoir simulation study on the permeability jail’s effect during tight gas production[J]. Journal of Porous Media, 2021, 24(2): 77-95.
[10] 赵文, 吴克柳, 姜林, 等. 基于孔隙网络模拟的致密砂岩气充注与微观气水赋存特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(5): 69-79.
ZHAO Wen, WU Keliu, JIANG Lin, et al.Charging and microscopic gas-water occurrence characteristics of tight sandstone gas based on pore network model[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(5): 69-79.
[11] 朱讯, 肖富森, 洪海涛, 等. 四川盆地中部地区致密河道砂岩气藏高产井地震模式及井轨迹设计[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2020, 43(3): 86-93.
ZHU Xun, XIAO Fusen, HONG Haitao, et al.Seismic model and wellbore trajectory design for high-yield wells of tight channel sandstone gas reservoirs, central Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2020, 43(3): 86-93.
[12] 杨光, 朱华, 黄东, 等. 四川超级富气盆地特征及油气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2020, 43(3): 1-7.
YANG Guang, ZHU Hua, HUANG Dong, et al.Characteristics and exploration potential of the super gas-rich Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2020, 43(3): 1-7.
[13] 李国辉, 苑保国, 朱华, 等. 四川盆地超级富气成因探讨[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(5): 1-10.
LI Guohui, YUAN Baoguo, ZHU Hua, et al.Genesis of super-rich gas in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(5): 1-10.
[14] 付海峰, 才博, 庚勐, 等. 基于储层纵向非均质性的水力压裂裂缝三维扩展模拟[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(5): 56-68.
FU Haifeng, CAI Bo, GENG Meng, et al.Three dimensional simulation of hydraulic fracture propagation based on vertical reservoir heterogeneity[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(5): 56-68.
[15] 王雨杰, 贺学铭, 王志恒, 等. 纵横波源下含油气薄储层地震响应特征的对比分析[J]. 地质论评, 2023, 69(增刊1): 429-432.
WANG Yujie, HE Xueming, WANG Zhiheng, et al.Comparative analysis of seismic response characteristics of thin oil-gas reservoir by P-and S-wave sources[J]. Geological Review, 2023, 69(S1): 429-432.
[16] 范建柯, 丁志峰, 郭慧丽, 等. 山东地区地壳三维纵横波速度和泊松比结构及其对地震活动性的影响[J]. 地震学报, 2022, 44(6): 921-934.
FAN Jianke, DING Zhifeng, GUO Huili, et al.3-D P and S wave velocity of crust and Poisson’s ratio structures and their influence on seismic activity in Shandong area[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2022, 44(6): 921-934.
[17] 孙志广, 谷丙洛, 张永杰, 等. 地震波场纵横波分离方法研究综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2023, 38(3): 1169-1190.
SUN Zhiguang, GU Bingluo, ZHANG Yongjie, et al.Review of seismic P-and S-wavefields separation methods[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2023, 38(3): 1169-1190.
[18] 张卫卫, 刘军, 刘力辉, 等. 珠江口盆地番禺4洼古近系文昌组岩性预测技术及应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(6): 118-125.
ZHANG Weiwei, LIU Jun, LIU Lihui, et al.Lithology prediction technology and its application of Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Panyu 4 depression, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2022, 34(6): 118-125.
[19] 赵俊峰. 超致密砂岩气层识别方法[J]. 中国科技信息, 2022(12): 92-94.
ZHAO Junfeng.Identification of ultra-tight sandstone gas reservoirs[J]. China Science and Technology Information, 2022(12): 92-94.
[20] 冯欣雨, 肖晖, 李泉辉, 等. 致密砂岩水力裂缝特征实验研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2023, 10(4): 132-138.
FENG Xinyu, XIAO Hui, LI Quanhui, et al.Experimental study on hydraulic fracture characteristics of tight sandstone[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(4): 132-138.
[21] 张凤琼, 肖晖, 陈依, 等. 川东地区凉高山组致密砂岩压裂工艺优选研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2023, 10(4): 117-125.
ZHANG Fengqiong, XIAO Hui, CHEN Yi, et al.Study on fracturing technology optimization of tight sandstone in Lianggaoshan Formation in eastern Sichuan area[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(4): 117-125.
[22] 孔祥伟, 严仁田, 张思琦, 等. 真三轴大物模水力压裂裂缝起裂及扩展模拟实验[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2023, 52(3): 97-102.
KONG Xiangwei, YAN Rentian, ZHANG Siqi, et al.Simulation experiment of fracture initiation and propagation of hydraulic fracturing with true triaxial large physical model[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2023, 52(3): 97-102.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献

访问统计